funny cats and dogs

funny cats and dogs. funny cats and dogs.
  • funny cats and dogs.



  • thatisme
    Mar 29, 08:42 AM
    no manufacturer uses effective focal lengths to refer to lenses for dslrs (e. g. it's a 17-55 mm f/2.8 lens and not a 27-88 mm f/2.8 (equiv.) lens), be it a lens tailored for crop lenses or otherwise, but always the physical focal length.

    Correct. Your lens is based in 35mm terms. So by utilizing a less than 35mm sensor'd camera, you are not using the full 35mm image being projected which is where this 1.6 factor comes into play.

    Where RobbieDuncan is missing the boat, and most that are arguing incorrectly is that the image will be the same using an EF lens on either a 1.6 sensor'd camera or a FF sensor'd camera. The end result is that it will not. Focal length of the lens has not changed, but your image has.

    For the EF-S lenses, since the rear element is smaller, your image circle is smaller, and is tailored to the 1.6 sensors... agreed? Ok. How can this now apply to 35mm? you don't have a full 35mm image circle projected through the lens. So apply your FOVCF to the actual focal length and you will get a hypothetical, imaginary number that equated to 35mm. But since your lens elements cant transmit a full 35mm image, then the argument goes out the window.

    What does happen, as indicated by the linked image earlier whereby the 5D was modified to accept an EF-S lens, the image is not complete. Not enough image is sent through the optics of the lens. This shows exactly what my argument has been all along.... the image will be different. What a 1.6 camera is doing is taking that sample image, but only recording the center of it. So, Effectively, it is a zoomed image. So the Effective Focal Length for that image is bigger... say 50mm, where the lens may have been an EF-S 35mm.





    funny cats and dogs. the very funny cats video
  • the very funny cats video



  • Rodimus Prime
    Jun 14, 06:56 PM
    about time they put in built in wifi on it.





    funny cats and dogs. Funny Cats, Funny Dogs,
  • Funny Cats, Funny Dogs,



  • mikelegacy
    Jan 4, 02:49 PM
    There is no option to preload maps like motionx has when you start out?
    Nope.





    funny cats and dogs. funny pictures driving cat
  • funny pictures driving cat



  • ~Shard~
    Oct 26, 12:56 PM
    No PowerPC version? Ouch. Lets hope that's not a growing trend for all you golden oldies out there :p

    Yeah, I knew this was inevitable. (I'm running a 1.25 GHz G4 iMac.) That being said, for the applications I use (and this won't be one of them), I honestly don't see myself being forced to buy an Intel machine for a loooong time. Just because Adobe has decided to rpoceed in this manner doesn't mean other companies will follow suit. And you can bet that Apple definitely won't, at least not for a few more years. Heck, Classic was supported until what, last year essentially? And the G3 machines up until Leopard? ;) :cool:



    more...


    funny cats and dogs. funny-pictures-cats-drop-dogs-
  • funny-pictures-cats-drop-dogs-



  • OdduWon
    Oct 10, 01:31 PM
    It's pretty clear that Apple will not be releasing to laptops before the holiday season. Laptops just aren't the typical gift. They are in the wrong price range.

    Don't be surprised to see iTV sooner than later or the long waited video iPod.

    Expect the new revised Mac Book Pro in January, featuring a redesigned enclosure and keyboard.

    Sorry, but that the way it is.




    funny cats and dogs. Categories : cats
  • Categories : cats



  • gnasher729
    Mar 25, 09:01 AM
    i bet they had people there with MBA's from good schools running financial what if's and telling management to avoid digital because they will make less money due to not selling the film or anything other than the camera

    Don't know who said it, but "if you don't cannibalise your products, someone else will". Which is exactly what happened to Kodak.


    Greedy or not, if Apple and RIM are part of some patent infringement they have to pay up.

    First, there is an "if" in that statement. Second, they wouldn't have to pay what Kodak demands, but actual damages. Third, Kodak has a market caps of $944 million, so if Apple and/or RIM thought there was any danger they have to pay $1bn, they would buy the company. Apparently they don't.



    more...


    funny cats and dogs. funny dogs with guns
  • funny dogs with guns



  • itcheroni
    Apr 9, 05:20 PM
    And nobody said it was, or that you should repeat it indefinitely. But you can't expect people to get on board with severe cuts -- especially the ones they're now talking about to Medicare, Medicaid and SS -- if you're still overspending on defense, tax cuts for the rich, and corporate loopholes.

    The government funds plenty of things, like libraries and parks, that aren't "necessary" but wanted. In the end it's all about how much we're willing to pay for. What's odd is that you see the middle class wanting to keep many of those services; it's the rich and the corporations that are screaming bloody murder about them.

    Tax cuts isn't spending. That is the same thing as saying everything the government doesn't take from us is an expense to the government.

    And the rich and corporations are screaming bloody murder about libraries and parks? Aren't most of those things handled by local governments except for the big ones?





    funny cats and dogs. under Funny Cats amp; Dogs,
  • under Funny Cats amp; Dogs,



  • TheMacBookPro
    Apr 28, 10:27 AM
    Where do you think the Thunderbolt port might even go in the Air? Will it replace one of the USB ports? Doesn't seem like there's really that much room... thoughts?

    As mentioned, it'll take up a bit more space inside for the Thunderbolt controller but it'll simply replace the existing Mini DisplayPort so it becomes a 2-in-1 port on the outside.



    more...


    funny cats and dogs. called of the dogs amp; cats
  • called of the dogs amp; cats



  • powermac_daddy
    Oct 26, 08:31 PM
    overrated. these people just can't wait, can they?





    funny cats and dogs. videos of cats and dogs
  • videos of cats and dogs



  • itcheroni
    Apr 13, 04:10 AM
    Look, this is the second time you've told me, incorrectly, what you think I believe.

    "Informed people" is self-explanatory. I don't intend to spoon-feed you a response just so you can intentionally misrepresent it a third time.

    What I'm trying to do is understand your logic. The reason I'm summarizing your position is because I want to avoid misrepresenting you before I go on to explain my own point of view. Please show me where I misrepresented you. This isn't a political debate. I am only asking questions because I actually want to know the answers, not because I'm trying to "win". If you look back on our posts, I don't think you'll find any point where I intentionally misrepresented your posts. The fact that you're reacting defensively is surprising to me.

    Let's just forget it. It's my fault for expecting a rational conversation on a message board.


    The American government taxes less and serves less than any other western industrialized country, while spending over a trillion dollars a year trying to control foreign affairs through military might.

    That my friend, is a recipe for financial disaster.

    Have you been studying Mises?



    more...


    funny cats and dogs. Funny cats, dogs, and other
  • Funny cats, dogs, and other



  • iVoid
    Jun 18, 07:42 PM
    (And yes, I am sure such a 2TB card, if and when it ships, would be significantly expensive).

    Ironically, when technology is advanced enough to fit 2 TB on a little SDXC card, there will be a new specification in wide use instead. :) :)





    funny cats and dogs. funny cats and dogs video.
  • funny cats and dogs video.



  • Azathoth
    Mar 25, 10:21 AM
    They did not avoid digital at all, in fact they were an early entrant to digital. The problem was that they were used to having a lucrative near-monopoly in film, a fat side business in film processing and a nice low-end camera business built around proprietary "connvenience" film packaging. They were now facing aggressive consumer electronics companies who were used to relently feature upgrades and short model lifecycles. Moreover, they could not rely on their film dominance to keep competitors at a disadvantage. In other words, they had to change their business model completely-- from near monopoly to completely competitive-- in order to success in the new business. Only a fraction of companies manage to do this successfully.

    Keep in mind, also, due to the increased competition and lack of a film component, that the opportunity for Kodak in digital was much smaller than their film and related businesses. It's very hard to manage a shrinking company, and even harder if you are also trying to reinvent yourself.

    Not only that - but the fact that there is no film in a digital camera - Kodak is a "film emulsion" company. Professionals never bought Kodak cameras or lenses. There is no "film" in a digital camera. The most natural progression would have been for Kodak to make memory cards.

    Most of the R&D (and they did some great R&D in chemistry, materials and human image perception) were fundementally irrelevant to digital.

    The changes that Kodak would have needed to be relevant were so huge (fire 90% of staff, change the entire core business) that I don't think there was any way they could have been succesful.

    The successful camera companies today fall into one of two camps: 1. well established camera companies. 2. Consumer electronics companies.

    Afga (a film emulsion company): effectively dead.

    Fuji: very limited success (though they almost had their head above water for a while).



    more...


    funny cats and dogs. Funny Cats and Dogs 10975 4
  • Funny Cats and Dogs 10975 4



  • yankintx
    Nov 18, 07:02 AM
    So a 17 year old can do it but a gigantic company with $50 billion lying there can't. Seems logical to me. :rolleyes:

    Wake up Steve. Seriously.

    Don't fault apple for insisting that the white iPhone parts match perfectly.
    You can bet that if the suppliers could make parts to apples standards, then apple would sell white iPhone.
    If someone does a conversion and then has minor issues such as light leak and parts not matching 100%, they will most likely put up wih it.

    If apple sold white iphones with the same issues, it would be a disaster and a public relations nightmare. So many people who read these forums complain about things so minor, and yet they will put second rate parts on their iPhones and be happy with them.
    I don't blame apple one bit for scrubbing the white iPhone.

    Go figure!





    funny cats and dogs. funny photos of cats and dogs
  • funny photos of cats and dogs



  • freeny
    Aug 14, 03:56 PM
    Nonsense. Apple is selling a lot of computers right now because Jobs Osbourned the entire PowerPC range just over a year ago by announcing the switch to Intel. For each model of Mac, sales were artificially low before the Intel version was launched, and artificially higher after.

    Additionally, people are happer buying Macs if they know they can switch back to Windows if it doesn't work out. One of the major barriers to owning a Mac has been removed by the Intel switch (whatever my misgivings on the subject.)

    It's simply ridiculous to argue that the ads have helped sales. Sales would be much higher now than they would have been six months ago even if Apple had stopped advertising completely. The question is whether they would be even higher if they weren't insulting their target audience. The answer, of course, is yes.
    WOW! the evidence youve accumulated is astounding:confused::rolleyes:

    No advertising=more sales:confused: :eek:
    Why are you pushing your opnions as fact?....

    I agree with ready2switch below me



    more...


    funny cats and dogs. funny cats and dogs.
  • funny cats and dogs.



  • zeemeerman2
    Apr 12, 12:45 PM
    So what's fixed?
    To me, in Office nothing seemed broken.





    funny cats and dogs. funny cats and dogs video.
  • funny cats and dogs video.



  • ivan2002
    May 2, 02:06 PM
    My white iPhone 4 is definitely thicker than my wife's black iPhone 4.
    See how I said "my white iPhone 4" as opposed to "the white iPhone 4"?

    With that I showed a lot more professionalism than all these "experts" with their fancy measuring tools making conclusions about ALL phones based on the ONE they happen to have. The tool they all lack is the ability to draw logical conclusions.



    more...


    funny cats and dogs. Dogs
  • Dogs



  • prady16
    Oct 16, 06:32 PM
    I hope they come up with a CDMA version of the iPhone for Verizon too...
    Hopefully it should be out at the MWSF!





    funny cats and dogs. under Funny Cats amp; Dogs,
  • under Funny Cats amp; Dogs,



  • bildio
    Apr 17, 06:10 AM
    I installed Windows 7 with Bootcamp.

    Except for the initial installation steps, with reboots, Windows 7 does not shut down completely. I see the "Shutting down ...: message. Not sure if it will eventually shutdown or if there is a problem. If the latter, what's the fix?

    Other than this, Windows 7 seems to be working okay.





    funny cats and dogs. Tags: cat, cats, funny,
  • Tags: cat, cats, funny,



  • stubeeef
    May 25, 02:31 PM
    I think you deserve the stubeeef, semi weekly, "Darn Good Job Build'n Sumthin" award. You earned it! :D





    Eraserhead
    Mar 27, 08:23 AM
    How about if we just spend less and not raise more taxes?

    And cut what?





    Cappy
    Sep 20, 08:59 PM
    Originally posted by avkills
    Microsoft has not beat Apple as far as a 64bit consumer OS goes. Name one consumer chip that is 64bit. Thank you. Carry on.

    And your point is? There really isn't a need for 64bit cpu's let alone OS's for most consumers. AMD is essentially responsible for putting the pressure on the industry to move toward 64bit as soon as it is.

    For consumers a 64bit cpu and OS is nothing more than bragging rights...at least for a few years.

    Originally posted by avkills
    Also, I think NT is limited to 4 processors unless they have updated that recently. Clustering is not the same as a multi-processor machine. Unix scales better than NT, just deal with it. Apple could easily make a rack server that had 16 processors, with a kick arse OpenGL card and teach SGI a lesson. They don't have the market for that though...yet!

    -mark

    I'm not sure where you get your info but keep dreaming. You fail to mention what cpu's they would use. I don't think your going to see current G4's in 16 processor servers ever. It's just not designed to do it. That's not to say it cannot be done...just that it would be a waste of manpower and money to do it and not be very efficient at it no matter the market.





    dickrichie
    May 4, 07:56 AM
    Its about elegance and love. We dont just use our Macs they become friends and part of the family. We dont just look at them as computers but extensions of ourselves. No system is perfect but for us this is as close as we can get to perfection. So many of the things you said you can do on your Windows machine I dont doubt I just know we can do it easier and usually were able to do it well before you could. You mistake pride for bigotry. Yes I will admit that you can play more games than I can but thats what the PS2. gamecube and X box are for. About price, I agree the sticker shock is that the Mac is more expensive but when you look at what you get with it. especially in the video editing realm you start to realize that the windows side doesnt have anything anything to compare with it. Not without having to pay at least a few hundred dollars for. Sure you built your own machine but wheres the tech support or the warranty. Any of those parts go bad and you'll be replacing them yourself. Theres more cost built in to building than many people choose to admit. Fact is we all live in a world that runs on Windows machines. Office's are full of beige boxes that sometimes manage to get through a day of email and excel. What you may not think about is that while the penny pushers may move the money from place to place on a windows machine the marketing side usually gets the products sold on a Mac. Advertising firms and creative agencies that market the worlds products do it on a much more stable environment. So dont think of it as bigotry but instead a sense of pride that... well I saw a T-shirt on a guy in the Apple store on Friday night that said it best. "Its a Mac thing, you wouldnt understand"





    NebulaClash
    Apr 20, 06:48 PM
    We're...not...normal?

    Image (http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/8018/airplane2shatner.jpg)

    WHY THE HELL AREN'T I NOTIFIED ABOUT THESE THINGS?!? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHKd80asXy4)

    No, we are not normal. The average person does not read message boards about electronic devices and the companies that build them. So, no, we are not normal. We are gadget geeks.

    And I like being not normal in this way. Remember, it is never the normal people who change the world ;)





    Blue Velvet
    Oct 27, 06:11 PM
    Hope some of you guys will make it to the annual Macrumors London Picnic, usually in July or so. :)



    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    Blog Archive

    Total Pageviews